Jordan 10 Psychology for Religion The Cult of Sel

yan0z3t0

,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
It seems everyone you meet these days is a self-proclaimed psychologist. From radio speak shows, TV interviews, romance novels, newspaper journals, to cliques at go; everyone has an opinion on the latest “mental ailment.” I was 1st introduced to practical psychology when I connected the United States Air Force in 1970. It was anticipated that Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) would become counselors to their subordinates. Profession military teaching devoted entire chapters and lectures on non-directive or eclectic counseling techniques. Maslow's hierarchy of needs was drilled into our heads. We were sternly advised to avert anyone mention of religion, but instead to make abounding use of psychological techniques.
Paul Vitz in his writing “Psychology as Religion” ventures to disclose psychology for what it actually is, religion. He begins by giving the reader a summarize memoir ashore the dads of the modern psychology manoeuvre along with some of their theories. The opening chapter was dry reading but I assume required as a historical background. My amuse peaked while I quickly recognized Carl Rogers and Abraham Maslow since I was forced to study them for 26 years while in the military. Vitz also discusses Carl Jung, Erich Fromn, and Rollo May as being significant patrons to the manoeuvre.
Vitz speedily conversions into annotating the notion of self-esteem which he promotes as the megalopolis of the whole selfism movement. This became essential to me as it seems no material where you corner, a absence of or meager self-esteem appears to be the cause of every ill understood to mankind. For a movement to be so extensive to the point where psychology has been woven into the gospel message, Vitz says that the self-esteem concept has “no remove intellectual origins.” That’s a startling claim thinking the impact selfism has had on academia and the practice of counseling.
Vitz states that self-esteem should be understood for an affective rejoinder and not a reason. He says it is a response to what we have done and what others have done to us. High self-esteem is a preferable sensibility to have (favor happiness), yet the consciousness itself isn’t the cause of anything. In trying to win a sensibility of self-esteem, the merely successful access is to do good to others or realize someone. In so doing, you’ll get entire the self-esteem you ambition. However, the downside is human begin to pursue happiness as a far greater goal than the goal of obtaining private holiness.
Not only is selfism a self-defeating goal for the Christian, Vitz goes on to make the circumstance that it is also simply wrong science and a warped philosophy. The little clinical testify that does exist is mostly based on empirical observations and doesn’t stand the test of solid scientific problem solving. He exposes flaws in every step of the process, from stating the problem, forming and testing the hypothesis,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych],[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], to testing the conclusion. He also identifies several philosophical contradictions and in some cases,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], actual misrepresentations. The scatter of this bad science and faulty philosophy is believed by the lyricist to have endowed to the erasure of families. Additionally, the entire revitalization team intellect convinces the person with “low self-esteem” that their ills are due to trauma inflicted on them in the past. Recovery group treatment strokes the patient with self-pity thereby convincing the consumers are martyrs. Once labeled, the “victim” immediately assumes the viewpoint of victimhood.
Values clarification has transform the model educated in schools and begins with the speculation that man is certainly good. Since the developers of merits clarification reject moral educations, Vitz claims that if responsible adults, teachers,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych],[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], don’t enhance good values then somebody else will. Providing a permissive environment supposedly nourishes the baby by granting satisfaction for the child’s appetites and interests. However, this philosophy is bankrupt for kids will suppose the values of irresponsible sources in lieu of responsible ones. This comb